← AgentTrust

On-Chain Reputation vs. Traditional Analytics

May 14, 2026 · 4 min read

Tools like Chainalysis, Nansen, and TRM Labs have dominated blockchain analytics for years. They sell to banks, regulators, and hedge funds — humans who read dashboards. AgentTrust takes a fundamentally different approach: building reputation for autonomous agents, not analysts.

Key Differences

FeatureChainalysis / NansenAgentTrust
Target UserAnalysts, complianceAI Agents
Pricing$40k-$100k+/year$0.01/query
Payment ModelEnterprise contractPay-per-use (x402)
Response TimeMinutesMilliseconds
API AccessEnterprise onlyPublic, self-serve
Agent FrameworksNoneElizaOS, AgentKit, LangChain, CrewAI
Signed ScoresNoYes (cryptographic)
WebhooksNoYes

Why Agents Need a Different Approach

An autonomous agent cannot:

Agents need an API that another program can call — instantly, cheaply, and without human intervention. That's what AgentTrust provides.

The x402 Connection

The x402 protocol lets agents pay micro-transactions in USDC automatically. AgentTrust complements x402 by answering the question: "Who should I pay?" Together, they form the payment + trust layer for the agent economy.

Designed for Scale

AgentTrust scores are computed from public on-chain data via direct RPC and explorer APIs. No indexing, no database, no custodianship. Scores can be cached, signed, and verified by any third party — making them trustless and composable.

Ready to try a different approach to on-chain reputation?

Check a Wallet →